Back to preview
  • Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births (Line chart)
  • Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births (Bar chart)
  • Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births (Map)
  • Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births (Boxplot chart)
Data set notes
European Health for All database

Indicators: 565
Updated: 18 October 2024

The following abbreviations are used in the indicator titles:
•    SDR: age-standardized death rates (see HFA-DB user manual/Technical notes, page 13, for details)
•    FTE: full-time equivalent
•    PP: physical persons
•    PPP$: purchasing power parities expressed in US $, an internationally comparable scale reflecting the relative domestic purchasing powers of currencies.

Indicator notes
Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births
Indicator code: E070104.T This indicator shares the definition with the parent indicator \"\".

The numbers of deaths in infants between 4 weeks and a year of age in a year.

Country/Area notes
No information
General notes

Understanding Postneonatal Deaths per 1000 Live Births

Postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births is a critical health indicator that measures the number of deaths of infants aged between 28 days and one year per 1000 live births within a given year. This metric helps in understanding the effectiveness of healthcare during the later stages of an infant's first year of life. It reflects on the postnatal care facilities and socio-economic conditions that might affect infant survival beyond the neonatal period. By monitoring this indicator, health organizations and policymakers can target improvements in child healthcare services and parental education, aiming to reduce these vulnerable deaths.

Calculating Postneonatal Deaths per 1000 Live Births

To calculate the rate of postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births, health statisticians divide the number of postneonatal deaths within a year by the number of live births in the same year, then multiply the result by 1000. This formula provides a standardized measure to compare across different regions and time periods. Accurate data collection from hospitals, health clinics, and birth/death registries is crucial for this calculation. The reliability of this data directly impacts the accuracy of the health indicator, influencing health policy and resource allocation.

The Importance of Monitoring Postneonatal Deaths

Tracking the rate of postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births is vital for assessing the health and well-being of infants in their first year. This indicator not only highlights the effectiveness of postnatal care but also signals potential issues in the broader health system, including access to healthcare, maternal education, and economic stability. Public health initiatives often use this data to enhance healthcare policies, improve service delivery, and reduce infant mortality rates, thereby ensuring healthier future generations.

Strengths and Limitations of the Postneonatal Death Rate Indicator

While the postneonatal death rate is a valuable health metric, it comes with its own set of strengths and limitations that affect its utility and interpretation.

Strengths

This indicator is crucial for global health monitoring, providing clear insights into the effectiveness of the second phase of infant healthcare. It allows for international comparisons and trend analysis, helping to identify successful healthcare strategies and areas needing attention. Moreover, it aids in resource allocation, ensuring that interventions are directed where they are most needed to improve infant survival rates.

Limitations

However, the accuracy of the postneonatal death rate heavily depends on the quality of data collection. In regions with poor health reporting systems, this data might be underreported or inaccurately captured, leading to misleading conclusions. Furthermore, this indicator does not account for the causes of death, which are crucial for developing targeted interventions. It also fails to capture the socio-economic and environmental factors that might influence postneonatal mortality, such as parental education, household income, and access to clean water and sanitation.

Additionally, the postneonatal death rate does not reflect the seasonal and geographical variations that can significantly impact infant health. For instance, in areas prone to seasonal diseases or with limited healthcare access during certain times of the year, the postneonatal mortality rate might fluctuate, which this annual rate does not capture.

In conclusion, while the postneonatal deaths per 1000 live births is a fundamental indicator for evaluating infant health and healthcare effectiveness, it must be interpreted with an understanding of its broader context and limitations. Continuous efforts to improve data accuracy and granularity will enhance its utility, helping to save more lives and improve health outcomes for infants globally.