See full graph
Back to preview
European Programme of Work
Indicators: 48
Updated: 21 November 2023
Contact:
The European Programme of Work, 2020–2025 – “United Action for Better Health in Europe” (EPW), was adopted by the 70th session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe (RC70) (EUR/RC70/11 Rev.4). The EPW shapes the Region’s contribution to the Thirteenth General Programme of Work (GPW 13) in its three interconnected strategic priorities:
• Moving towards universal health coverage (UHC)
• Moving towards universal health coverage (UHC)
• Protecting people better against health emergencies
• Ensuring healthy lives and well-being for all at all ages.
In the European Region, The EPW is the leading policy framework to steer and coordinate action towards building back better after the COVID-19 crisis. It supports countries in their commitments to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-Being for All. It puts particular focus on supporting capacities for effective health leadership and engagement with other policy sectors.
4 flagship initiatives
4 flagship initiatives
• The Mental Health Coalition
• Empowerment through Digital Health
• The European Immunization Agenda 2030
• Healthier behaviours: incorporating behavioural and cultural insights
The EPW measurement framework includes 26 indicator areas of high importance to monitor progress towards leaving no one behind. It encompasses a subset of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) targets and outcome indicators included in the GPW13 WHO Impact Framework as a basis. The indicators selected from this framework are then complemented with additional indicators found in other frameworks throughout the European Region. It also uses a concrete milestone to be achieved by 2025, to ensure that the measurement framework is well aligned with the European context.
The EPW measurement framework indicators focus on two major issues of COVID-19 and inequity. These indicators were chosen based on predetermined criteria, to ensure that they are appropriate, feasible and aligned with existing global or regional strategies or strategies under development. Wherever possible, the EPW measurement framework uses indicators that are informative for multiple core priorities and flagship initiatives (for example, an indicator on premature noncommunicable disease mortality serves both the universal health coverage and healthier populations core priorities). At a minimum, the EPW measurement framework aims to disaggregate relevant indicators by sex and age. Whenever feasible, additional disaggregation, such as by socioeconomic status and geographical levels, is planned.
Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services (%)
source link
Definition:
Population drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, rainwater, and packaged or delivered water.
Method of estimation:
The JMP assembles, reviews and assesses national data collected by statistics offices and other relevant institutions including sectoral authorities. Linear regression is used to provide estimates of the population using improved drinking water sources, as well as the proportion with improved water supplies on premises. Regressions are also made to estimate the population using piped water supplies; this is constrained to not exceed the estimate for total improved drinking water sources. The proportion of the population using improved drinking water facilities that accesses those facilities with a collection time of thirty minutes or less is estimated by taking an average of all available data from household surveys and censuses. Separate regressions are made on three service level parameters: (1) the proportion of the population which drinks water from improved water sources which are accessible on premises, (2) the proportion of the population which drinks water from improved water sources which are available when needed (that is, households are able to access sufficient quantities of water when needed), and (3) the proportion of the population which drinks water from improved water sources which are compliant relevant national or local standards (for E. coli, and for arsenic and fluoride if available). In the absence of such standards, reference is made to the WHO Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. Separate regressions are made for urban and rural areas. The most recent household survey or census available for most countries was typically conducted two to six years ago. The JMP extrapolates regressions for two years beyond the last available data point. Beyond this point the estimates remain unchanged for up to four years unless coverage is below 0.5 per cent or above 99.5 per cent, in which case the line is extended indefinitely. Since the data sources used for different service level parameters may not be the same, it is not always possible to determine which households or populations meet all three of the service level criteria. Instead, safely managed drinking water services are calculated at the urban and rural levels by taking the minimum of the three service level parameters. National estimates are generated as weighted averages of the urban and rural estimates, using population data from the most recent report of the United Nations Population Division. For more information see https://washdata.org/monitoring/methods/estimation-methods Predominant type of statistics: adjusted and predicted.
source link
Definition:
Population drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, rainwater, and packaged or delivered water.
Method of estimation:
The JMP assembles, reviews and assesses national data collected by statistics offices and other relevant institutions including sectoral authorities. Linear regression is used to provide estimates of the population using improved drinking water sources, as well as the proportion with improved water supplies on premises. Regressions are also made to estimate the population using piped water supplies; this is constrained to not exceed the estimate for total improved drinking water sources. The proportion of the population using improved drinking water facilities that accesses those facilities with a collection time of thirty minutes or less is estimated by taking an average of all available data from household surveys and censuses. Separate regressions are made on three service level parameters: (1) the proportion of the population which drinks water from improved water sources which are accessible on premises, (2) the proportion of the population which drinks water from improved water sources which are available when needed (that is, households are able to access sufficient quantities of water when needed), and (3) the proportion of the population which drinks water from improved water sources which are compliant relevant national or local standards (for E. coli, and for arsenic and fluoride if available). In the absence of such standards, reference is made to the WHO Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. Separate regressions are made for urban and rural areas. The most recent household survey or census available for most countries was typically conducted two to six years ago. The JMP extrapolates regressions for two years beyond the last available data point. Beyond this point the estimates remain unchanged for up to four years unless coverage is below 0.5 per cent or above 99.5 per cent, in which case the line is extended indefinitely. Since the data sources used for different service level parameters may not be the same, it is not always possible to determine which households or populations meet all three of the service level criteria. Instead, safely managed drinking water services are calculated at the urban and rural levels by taking the minimum of the three service level parameters. National estimates are generated as weighted averages of the urban and rural estimates, using population data from the most recent report of the United Nations Population Division. For more information see https://washdata.org/monitoring/methods/estimation-methods Predominant type of statistics: adjusted and predicted.
Country/Area notes
No information